Changes
Page history
Updated AccuracyHaswell (markdown)
authored
Jun 24, 2015
by
Thomas Roehl
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
AccuracyHaswell.md
View page @
3530d326
...
...
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Benchmark performed with data sizes: 12kB, 1MB, 4MB, 1GB.
Each data size is tested 5 times, hence the first 5 entries on the x-axis correspond to the 5 runs for the first data size of 12kB and so on.
<br>


The table contains the values after scaling the original values up using the scaling factor 1.00.
...
...
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ Benchmark performed with data sizes: 12kB, 1MB, 4MB, 1GB.
Each data size is tested 5 times, hence the first 5 entries on the x-axis correspond to the 5 runs for the first data size of 12kB and so on.
<br>


The table contains the values after scaling the original values up using the scaling factor 1.25.
...
...
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Benchmark performed with data sizes: 12kB, 1MB, 4MB, 1GB.
Each data size is tested 5 times, hence the first 5 entries on the x-axis correspond to the 5 runs for the first data size of 12kB and so on.
<br>


The table contains the values after scaling the original values up using the scaling factor 1.50.
...
...
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ Benchmark performed with data sizes: 12kB, 1MB, 4MB, 1GB.
Each data size is tested 5 times, hence the first 5 entries on the x-axis correspond to the 5 runs for the first data size of 12kB and so on.
<br>


The table contains the values after scaling the original values up using the scaling factor 1.33.
...
...
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ Benchmark performed with data sizes: 12kB, 1MB, 4MB, 1GB.
Each data size is tested 5 times, hence the first 5 entries on the x-axis correspond to the 5 runs for the first data size of 12kB and so on.
<br>


The table contains the values after scaling the original values up using the scaling factor 2.00.
...
...
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ Benchmark performed with data sizes: 12kB, 1MB, 4MB, 1GB.
Each data size is tested 5 times, hence the first 5 entries on the x-axis correspond to the 5 runs for the first data size of 12kB and so on.
<br>


The table contains the values after scaling the original values up using the scaling factor 1.00.
...
...
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ Benchmark performed with data sizes: 12kB, 1MB, 4MB, 1GB.
Each data size is tested 5 times, hence the first 5 entries on the x-axis correspond to the 5 runs for the first data size of 12kB and so on.
<br>


The table contains the values after scaling the original values up using the scaling factor 1.33.
...
...
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ Benchmark performed with data sizes: 12kB, 1MB, 4MB, 1GB.
Each data size is tested 5 times, hence the first 5 entries on the x-axis correspond to the 5 runs for the first data size of 12kB and so on.
<br>


The table contains the values after scaling the original values up using the scaling factor 1.50.
...
...
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ Benchmark performed with data sizes: 12kB, 1MB, 4MB, 1GB.
Each data size is tested 5 times, hence the first 5 entries on the x-axis correspond to the 5 runs for the first data size of 12kB and so on.
<br>


The table contains the values after scaling the original values up using the scaling factor 1.33.
...
...
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ Benchmark performed with data sizes: 12kB, 1MB, 4MB, 1GB.
Each data size is tested 5 times, hence the first 5 entries on the x-axis correspond to the 5 runs for the first data size of 12kB and so on.
<br>


The table contains the values after scaling the original values up using the scaling factor 2.00.
...
...
...
...